Image 01 Image 03

New Report Connects Covid Vaccine to Adverse Effect on Female Fertility

New Report Connects Covid Vaccine to Adverse Effect on Female Fertility

If, like the myocarditis link, officials hid the truth about adverse impacts on fertility, then it is a crime against humanity.

One of the problems with the recent revelations about federal government officials hiding was what was known about the link between adverse impacts on the heart tissue (myocarditis) and the COVID-19 shot, is that there is now reason to question much of the assertions they made about the vaccines being “safe and effective”.

Let’s take a look at the claims that the vaccine had no impact on human fertility or pregnancy. As an example, a Baylor University study in 2023 tracked the levels of Anti-Müllerian Hormone AMH) in women. By way of background, AMH is introduced by specialized cells in the small, growing follicles of the ovaries.

AMH levels in the blood reflect the number of these developing follicles, making it a widely used marker to estimate a woman’s ovarian reserve—that is, the remaining quantity of eggs in the ovaries. The ovarian reserve is the ovary’s ability to produce eggs capable of fertilization, resulting in a healthy, successful pregnancy.

Antral Follicle Count (AFC) is another key measurement. Antral follicles present in a woman’s ovaries at a specific point in her menstrual cycle, typically between days 2 and 5. Each antral follicle contains an immature egg, and these follicles represent the pool of eggs available for possible ovulation and fertility treatments.

The Baylor study assessed both factors and determined there was no link between the COVID-19 vaccine and poor ovarian health.

A more recent study (Impact of mRNA and Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccines on Ovarian Reserve) published in Vaccine (March 2025) investigated the effects of both mRNA and inactivated COVID-19 vaccines on ovarian reserve using a rat model.

The findings were much more troubling.

The researchers took 30 female Wistar albino rats, divided into three groups: control, mRNA vaccine (like the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines), and inactivated vaccine (like the Novavax vaccine) and studied a wider array of hormones and features that not only included follicle count and AMH but also transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGF-β1, a hormone deeply involved in the recruitment and growth of ovarian follicles), Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF, for the maturation of follicles), and caspase-3 (a hormone regulating the life cycle of ovarian cells).

So, right away, it appears that the study from the Turkish researchers who conducted the study was a bit more broad-based. Let’s see what it uncovered:

  • Increased markers of apoptosis and increased markers of angiogenesis, which are laboratory findings that indicate heightened activity of two distinct biological processes: programmed cell death (apoptosis) and new blood vessel formation (angiogenesis).
  • Reduced AMH Expression: Indicating a potential for reduced viable egg count.
  • Follicle Count Changes: The inactivated vaccine group had significantly fewer primordial, primary, and secondary follicles (representing different stages of development) compared to controls. The mRNA vaccine group had even fewer follicles than the inactivated group and showed a decrease in antral and preovulatory follicles, with an increase in atretic (degenerating) follicles

The study suggests that both mRNA and inactivated COVID-19 vaccines negatively affect ovarian reserve in rats. The effects are more pronounced with the mRNA vaccine.

It must be noted that the authors emphasize that these findings are from a rat model and that further research in humans is necessary before drawing clinical conclusions.

I would like to offer this bit of history in this discussion, via Hot Air’s David Strom:

It has long been known that women who were administered the COVID-19 vaccines suffered from menstrual changes–this effect was noticed early on and is now well-established–so it shouldn’t be shocking that the vaccines had a detrimental impact on fertility itself.

Despite this fact, public health officials went on a campaign to reassure women that there was no danger at all to their fertility and that any suggestion that there might be was misinformation–misinformation that was, of course, censored for quite a while.

Oops.

I agree with him. If, like the myocarditis link, officials hid the truth about adverse impacts on fertility, then it is a crime against humanity.

I shudder to think about what the next batch of redacted vaccine documents will show, and am grateful that the Turkish researchers were able to get their findings published.

Good policy is based on all the information, just not the studies that fit the preferred political narrative.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Tags:

Comments


 
 0 
 
 2
ztakddot | May 25, 2025 at 7:41 pm

What have they hidden about non-Covid inconveniences.

Most normal people KNEW better than to give their kids the vaccine. Even the most insane leftist schools did not go so far as to mandate it.


     
     0 
     
     5
    MattMusson in reply to Andy. | May 25, 2025 at 8:46 pm

    I was shocked by the number of fellow Boomers who insisted their children get their grandkids vaccinated and would not visit their families until it was done.


       
       0 
       
       2
      CommoChief in reply to MattMusson. | May 25, 2025 at 9:16 pm

      Boomers seem more group oriented/conformist compared to younger generations who value more individual independence at least in my own experience and observation. Not surprising they went overboard on Rona. Keep in mind the largest and most enduring, consistent support for Biden came from the over 65 demo. Other age cohorts varied far more than the 65+ cohort who hovered in a range of about 4 points from election.


       
       0 
       
       7
      diver64 in reply to MattMusson. | May 26, 2025 at 5:46 am

      I was shocked at the hysteria and the number of people that believed it. The data was not there to support any of the claims and if you stopped for just a second and thought about it they were just not believable. 90% effectiveness? Based on what, now? Nothing? Wife and I didn’t get the gene therapy and refused to wear the stupid masks. Nothing supported doing so.


       
       0 
       
       0
      JohnSmith100 in reply to MattMusson. | May 26, 2025 at 2:35 pm

      Drug companies committed fraud to get approval and immunity, it should be possible to sue them. What does it take tonmake that happen? .


 
 0 
 
 1
alaskabob | May 25, 2025 at 7:55 pm

Exactly what Hillary wanted…. only migrant (soon to be Dem voters) to have the dependent children on government welfare. None of the illegals were vaxed when crossing the border.

I think we need reparations taken from the people with no direct connection to the situation and given to those with a first hand connection to the shots, But first, I nominate Fauci as the first test case of Joe’s non compos mentis Autopen pardons.


     
     0 
     
     0
    Milhouse in reply to jb4. | May 29, 2025 at 1:07 am

    The autopen is irrelevant. All that matters is whether Biden said he wanted to pardon these people; if he did, the pardons are valid. And you can’t prove he didn’t.


 
 0 
 
 5
irishgladiator63 | May 25, 2025 at 8:08 pm

You don’t say. Almost as if they were designed to reduce the human population…

    :If”? The entire COVID Fraud was designed to destroy civilization. Fortunately, it failed – but just barely.


     
     0 
     
     0
    henrybowman in reply to irishgladiator63. | May 25, 2025 at 9:41 pm

    Seriously, if you haven’t seen Utopia (Netflix has the US version, which I prefer), watch it.


     
     0 
     
     3
    DaveGinOly in reply to irishgladiator63. | May 26, 2025 at 1:45 am

    Comment I made at https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/university-fires-dr-francis-christian-covid-vaccines-kids/, 6/26/21:

    There’s only one reason to insist upon vaccinating young people who are not at risk from COVID itself – If you wanted to reduce the world’s population through sterilization, you’d 1.) sterilize those who are not yet breeding; and 2.) if using a form of sterilization that was somewhat less than 100% effective, you’d want to sterilize as many people in that class of people as possible to have the greatest possible effect in the reduction of the population.

    The insane insistence upon the vaccination of EVERYONE (including those who have already had COVID, and are thus now naturally immune) is cover for the specific goal of vaccinating (and possibly sterilizing) children, teenagers, and young adults.

    I’m not saying this is what is happening. What I’m saying is this is the only thing that makes sense. Absent this scenario, I can’t imagine what is driving the insanity (and if this scenario is happening, suddenly the “insanity” goes away, because then what is happening becomes completely logical).


     
     0 
     
     2
    chocopot in reply to irishgladiator63. | May 26, 2025 at 10:26 am

    Actually, designed to reduce the First World population while facilitating the invasion of the First World by Third World dregs for “population replacement.” The Left doesn’t do anything without having planned it all out beforehand.


 
 0 
 
 6
Lucifer Morningstar | May 25, 2025 at 8:35 pm

Well, what else is new. We were all lied to about the necessity if receiving the covid vaccines. We were all lied to about the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines. We were lied to about the serious side-effects and consequences of receiving the vaccine. We were lied to from the very beginning to the very end. And now? Whatever. It’s far too little, far too late to do anything about it. Millions of women, men, children and infants worldwide were coerced into getting these vaccines and now it’s just too fecking late to do anything about it. So get ready for the population collapse. It ain’t gonna be pretty. That’s for sure.


 
 0 
 
 3
Red Echos | May 25, 2025 at 8:44 pm

We were told this a long time ago, like Apr 2021. Good to get confirmation


     
     0 
     
     5
    henrybowman in reply to Red Echos. | May 25, 2025 at 9:42 pm

    Naomi Wolf did a whole book about this, It’s how she got canceled by her leftist pals. This is not new news, though more confirmation data is always welcome.

    They came for the grannies, the babies, and the athletes. Who’s next?


     
     0 
     
     5
    nordic prince in reply to Red Echos. | May 25, 2025 at 10:00 pm

    Yeah, this is old news, but at least the normies are finally catching on to this.

    The clot shot’s adverse effects on female fertility are not a bug, they’re a feature.

    Never underestimate how much these globalists hate us.


 
 0 
 
 7
CommoChief | May 25, 2025 at 9:21 pm

I recall having this same discussion with my daughter (healthy, fit/athletic, 18 year old) and advising her not to take the jab for this reason. There was already a bunch of info out that mRNA was potentially an unsuitable delivery method for this reason by the time the jab was rolled out for general public.


 
 0 
 
 2
gibbie | May 25, 2025 at 10:42 pm

Once again, I suggest you all read this:
https://www.amazon.com/This-Your-Brain-Birth-Control/dp/B07Y3ZZGNZ/

If you think the only effect of hormonal birth control is prevention of pregnancy, you’re not thinking.


 
 0 
 
 5
AlecRawls | May 26, 2025 at 2:11 am

Before there ever was a covid vaccine, it was known about the limped nano-particles used in the mRNA delivery system that they get preferentially absorbed by the gonads. That was discovered by Japanese researchers sometime before the vaccine roll-out.

This absorption by the gonads might be harmful in itself, and in the case of the Covid vax it meant that mass re-production of the toxic Sars-Cov-2 spike protein would be taking place inside the testes and the ovaries, which is an obvious red-flag for reproductive health.

Not that we needed to see any such red flags to know we should never give any experimental medicine to anyone who is not past reproductive age unless they are facing the direst medical necessity, worth risking the health of their future offspring for.

We learned that with the Thalidomide and DES tragedies, both of which caused birth defects and infertility.

Yet Fauci et al. tried, and largely succeeded, in MANDATE the most radical medical experiment in human history for every single person of reproductive age in the entire western world.

That’s a war-crime under the Nuremberg Code of medical ethics, by the way, and yes, most certainly a crime against humanity.


     
     0 
     
     0
    Milhouse in reply to AlecRawls. | May 29, 2025 at 1:10 am

    The “Nuremberg Code” is merely an opinion on ethics, held by some people. It is not a law, and certainly cannot create crimes of any kind, let alone war-crimes.


 
 1 
 
 0
diver64 | May 26, 2025 at 5:39 am

Before we run screaming for the hills lets wait to see if these results can be replicated. The problem is not the study, it might be valid, it’s that governments shut down all funding of studies like this to hide any adverse effects or discussions that there might be some of the shot.


     
     0 
     
     2
    Dolce Far Niente in reply to diver64. | May 26, 2025 at 10:49 am

    It is not necessary to study the effect of the vaxx on hormone profiles to determine what effect the vaxx has, only need to look at the numbers of miscarriages and premature births post-vaxx. The pregnancy rate has dropped significantly, as well as the number of live births among vaxxed women.

    This doesn’t prove the causality, but the correlation is too striking to ignore.

If you think fertility rates are low now, just wait until those vaccinated schoolkids reach their reproductive years in about 15-20 years or so. Fertility and IVF clinics will be doing a land-office business.


 
 0 
 
 3
Blackwing1 | May 26, 2025 at 9:01 am

Danger to pregnancy itself was right in the data that Pfizer presented when the jab was released:

Something like 82% of all women in their first trimester of pregnancy “spontaneously” miscarried after getting the jab.

That, alone, should have told everyone that this mRNA jab was far, far more dangerous than they were claiming.

“Safe and effective”, yeah. It didn’t prevent a person from spreading COVID, it didn’t prevent people from becoming infected with it, and it didn’t reduce symptoms or death rates of the people who got infected. But with the Dot-Gov butt-covering they gave the pharmaceutical companies, it was safe for them, and very effective at lining their pockets.


 
 0 
 
 0
scaulen | May 26, 2025 at 9:37 am

We were warned about this in 1988 with the release of the speculative documentary “Hell Comes to Frogtown”


 
 0 
 
 0
destroycommunism | May 26, 2025 at 1:15 pm

female fertility issues have more to do with the meetoo movement than the demvid19 takeover


 
 0 
 
 0
Ann in L.A. | May 27, 2025 at 3:49 pm

Life imitates Stargate.

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

OSZAR »