Image 01 Image 03

Supreme Court Lifts Injunction Blocking Trump From Ending Protections for Venezuelans

Supreme Court Lifts Injunction Blocking Trump From Ending Protections for Venezuelans

Trump wants to terminate theTemporary Protected Status (TPS) protections for some illegal aliens who arrived here through parole processes.

The Supreme Court voted 8-1 to lift an injunction that blocked President Donald Trump from ending Temporary Protected Status (TPS) protections for some illegal aliens who arrived here through parole processes.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is the only one who would have denied the application.

In February, DHS announced a plan to revoke the TPS protections of around 300,000 Venezuelans in America.

Former DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas extended the TPS protections for illegal aliens from El Salvador, Ukraine, and Venezuela until 2026 right before former President Joe Biden left office.

Mayorkas claimed the extension was needed “based on the severe humanitarian emergency the country continues to face due to political and economic crises under the inhumane Maduro regime.”

TPS applies to illegal aliens “who entered the U.S. without authorization or overstayed visas” from certain countries.

The people “qualify for work permits and can pursue asylum.”

In March, Judge Edward M. Chen of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California blocked the plan, even saying the plan “smacks of racism.”

The Trump administration appealed.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied the Trump administration’s request for a temporary injunction on Chen’s order as the case moves through the courts.

Trump asked SCOTUS to lift the injunction, claiming Chen overstepped his authority.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

Can we deport KBJ too??? Pretty please!!

According to the dim-witted, “affirmative action”/”DEI”-hire activist “Justice,” only a biologist is qualified to opine on what constitutes a “woman.”

Brown Jackson makes a perfect bench-mate for the dim-witted Latina. Two moronic peas in a pod.

    MarkS in reply to guyjones. | May 19, 2025 at 2:15 pm

    How can Justice Jackson determine what an illegal alien is since she’s not an anthropologist?

      diver64 in reply to MarkS. | May 19, 2025 at 3:07 pm

      Not an anthropologist, geography major, map maker or any other type of expert from the rambling incoherent rants and question she has been making from the bench. I saw one stat that in something like the first 100 days of her sitting on the bench she spoke 11,000 words to Clarence Thomas’s 100.

      guyjones in reply to MarkS. | May 19, 2025 at 6:35 pm

      LOL — good one!

Big Furry Deal. It’s not as though the change in status means they will be leaving the U.S. anytime soon.

    mailman in reply to JRaeL. | May 19, 2025 at 3:00 pm

    I’m going to go out in a limb here and hazard a guess that this decision means they will be going a lot sooner than had the Trump administration not had to appeal the decision to SCOTUS. Examples will need to be made and Democrats just handed Trump a great group to make an example of 😂😂

    CommoChief in reply to JRaeL. | May 19, 2025 at 3:16 pm

    I suspect many will go voluntarily. The Fed gov’t knows who these folks are and more/less where they are. With their status change they gotta go and pulling together info profile from across gov’t databases to find and eventually deport won’t take very long. If they choose to leave they can reapply for entry later but if they refuse then when eventually caught they get deported without possibility of being readmitted.

    JR in reply to JRaeL. | May 19, 2025 at 4:40 pm

    Exactly, that’s why all the liberal Justices even supported the decision. Only the whacked out Justice Jackson dissented.

McGehee 🇺🇲 | May 19, 2025 at 2:48 pm

In March, Judge Edward M. Chen of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California blocked the plan, even saying the plan “smacks of racism.”

In other words, Chen didn;t bother to rule on the legal question, but on his own emotional shortcomings and bias against the duly elected President of the United States.

Seems to me that would be out of compliance with “good behavior.”

    diver64 in reply to McGehee 🇺🇲. | May 19, 2025 at 3:09 pm

    You would think a judge ruling on his feelies instead of the law would disqualify him from the bench and be grounds for removal. It would only take a few for the lawfare to come to a halt. SCOTUS could reign in the courts right now but Roberts is too feckless to do it.

Every now and then they manage to get one right. Not exactly a good way to inspire confidence

destroycommunism | May 19, 2025 at 4:44 pm

kjb was seen standing in front of a urinal

I think they read the tea leaves cause this is not the way they have been dancing

    MattMusson in reply to gonzotx. | May 20, 2025 at 8:56 am

    The Federal Courts have gone All In to stop Trump. (Like the Media before them.)
    The SCOTUS can reign them in, or they can destroy their own credibility.

    Like the Media before them, they are diving off the bridge with a smile. But, they have not checked the water level below.

KBJ does have one advantage. She doesn’t have to waste time hearing a case before she decides how to vote—she already knows how she will note on any given case before she ever hears it.

    Paula in reply to Paula. | May 19, 2025 at 6:01 pm

    In one respect, she’s a lot like Biden. She doesn’t have to worry about making decisions.

    In her case, it’s because she’s made the decision ahead of time. In Biden’s case, someone else makes all the decisions for him.

    The Gentle Grizzly in reply to Paula. | May 19, 2025 at 7:06 pm

    Has any Supreme Court justice ever been asked to step down?

Only one. “In 1969, Abe Fortas became the first—and, to date, only—Supreme Court justice to resign under the threat of impeachment. ”

Another one, Salmon P Chase, was actually impeached but acquitted by the Senate.

OSZAR »